Charismatics Let Their Experiences Define Theology

In the blogosphere and elsewhere, I often come across something like this:

Charismatics let their experiences define their theology...yada, yada, yada.

To which, I can only answer, "Well, duh!"

I fail, however, to see how this is a real criticism. Moreover, I fail to see how non-charismatic, acharismatic, or anti-charismatic theology is any less defined by experience (or lack thereof).

Can someone help me out here?

Hebrews Chapter 2-Study Notes

Polycarp is Giving Away a Cool Book